Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than vivo X70 Pro, with an 89.7 score against 78.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a better cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, we must highlight that it's also an older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker cellphone. Vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro features a screen that is very similar to the Galaxy S10 Lite one, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count per screen inch. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a battery duration that is just as good as Galaxy S10 Lite's battery performance, although the vivo X70 Pro has a 1% smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.