Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the Google Pixel, with a global score of 88.3 against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy S10 design is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner than Google Pixel's, but it is also a little bit heavier. Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little better display pixels density, a larger screen and a way better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality photos, a less MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
Galaxy S10 counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.