Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S10's design has the same thickness than LG G7 ThinQ, but it is just a bit lighter.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10, and although they both have a same size display, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite higher count of pixels per display inch. Galaxy S10 has a bit better performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The LG G7 ThinQ captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos and a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality photos, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 16 megapixels resolution.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 has a bit superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 is a lot more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.