Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 global score. The Galaxy S10 design is much lighter and thinner than LG V60 ThinQ, despite of the fact that it was released just 13 months before. These devices use the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy S10 has a slightly better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better pixel density.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10 and LG V60 ThinQ both have quite similar processing units, both of them have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% greater battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.