Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with an 88.3 score against 86.3. Even though the Galaxy S10 is much older than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's construction is just a bit thinner and lighter. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot worse pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 32% bigger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor capturing way higher quality photos, a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.