Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having an 88.3 score against 82.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 is older than Moto G 5G Plus, it's body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy S10 features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S10 features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a better number of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 47 percent larger battery size. Moto G 5G Plus has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a much larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.