Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 74.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-08 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 4.80 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 284.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z's global score of 74.5. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy S10 is a much newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z, but it's much thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little better screen density and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3040. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S10 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations. The Galaxy S10 has a bigger storage for games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10 counts with greater battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.