Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One 5G's general score of 84.6. The Galaxy S10 design is much lighter and thinner than Motorola One 5G, despite of the fact that it was released only 19 months before. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit better performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 has a little more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Motorola One 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution camera and a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 47 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.