Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is an older device than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a processor that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy S10's CPU, both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S10 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.