Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is much better than Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction is just a little thinner and extremely lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, although it was released many years before. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.