Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 88.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52 body is extremely newer, but a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S10. Galaxy S10 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. Galaxy A52 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy A52 features a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.