Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. These devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should give you identical operating system features. The Galaxy S10 construction is noticeably lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro, despite of the fact that it was released only 11 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy S10 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.