Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, having an 86.3 score against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a lighter cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but both are equally thin. The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X70 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.