Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system. Even being the best in this comparison, Galaxy S20 FE is an older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Vivo X70 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a much higher resolution back camera.
Vivo X70 Pro features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Galaxy S20 FE one, although the vivo X70 Pro has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.