Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.02 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-10-30 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 599.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 11.65, which is way better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's 9.02 general score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 11 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is much newer than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's, but it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little more vivid display than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a larger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little bit longer battery performance than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 39 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.