Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 8.97 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-06-13 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Asus ZenFone 5z, having a overall score of 11.65 against 8.97. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is newer than Asus ZenFone 5z's, but it is thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper display than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better pixels number in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 5z, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 5z, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher video quality and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos.
The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than Asus ZenFone 5z, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.