Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-05-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 509 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than HTC 10, having a general score of 98 against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design has the same thickness than the HTC 10, but it's a lot heavier. The HTC 10 has a little sharper display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better processing power than HTC 10, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much longer battery life than HTC 10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better camera than HTC 10, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than HTC 10, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.