Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-10-01 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than HTC Desire 10 pro, getting a general score of 98 against 74.3. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the HTC Desire 10 pro.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a better pixel density, a bigger screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a larger aperture, a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery life than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.