Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.46 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2015-01-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Gray and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 185.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 11.65, which is way better than LG G Flex 2's global score of 9.46. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is extremely heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's a little thinner and also incredibly newer. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, providing the user some additional features and performance enhancements.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit better processor than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has 9 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an additional GPU. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a much smaller screen, a lot lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a quite worse screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better camera than LG G Flex 2, because it has a back camera with way more megapixels and a way higher video resolution.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG G Flex 2, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.