Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.13 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2014-07-22 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than LG G3 Cat. 6, getting a global score of 11.65 against 9.13. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is a lot newer and just a bit thinner than LG G3 Cat. 6's, although it's heavier. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 11 version while LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. LG G3 Cat. 6 features a sharper display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a back camera with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features superior battery duration than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G3 Cat. 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G3 Cat. 6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G3 Cat. 6, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.