Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 70.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-02-23 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.85 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 277 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek MT6750 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the LG K10 (2017)'s general score of 70.7. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while LG K10 (2017) has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much newer than the LG K10 (2017), it is notably heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better processing unit than LG K10 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better looking display than LG K10 (2017), because it has a much greater screen density, a way better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a lot bigger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG K10 (2017), because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than LG K10 (2017), because it has a lot higher resolution back camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than LG K10 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.