Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than LG K50's 72.2 general score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is a bit thicker and a lot heavier than LG K50. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much sharper screen than LG K50, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a quite larger display and a much higher number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little better performance than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG K50, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better videos and photos than LG K50, because it has a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery life than LG K50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.