Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 8.91 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-06 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 3.07 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.17 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 174.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 11.65, which is way better than the LG K51's 8.91 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 11 version while LG K51 has Android 10 version, providing the user some additional features and performance optimizations. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the LG K51.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better display than LG K51, because it has a way greater screen density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a quite bigger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than LG K51, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better hardware performance than LG K51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than LG K51, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than LG K51, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG K51, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K51. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG K51, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.