Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 71.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-08-02 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 205.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 505 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than LG Q6, having a 98 score against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer device than LG Q6, although it is a bit thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior hardware performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper screen than LG Q6, because it has a just a bit higher screen pixel density, a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes way better videos and photos than LG Q6, because it has a much more MP back facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Q6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG Q6, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.