Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-05-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the LG Q60, with a general score of 11.65 against 9.3. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is newer than LG Q60's, although it is a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 11 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a more vivid display than LG Q60, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a much greater pixels number per screen inch and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a SD card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a faster CPU than LG Q60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better battery lifetime than LG Q60, because it has a 43% larger battery size. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than LG Q60, because it has a camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a way higher video resolution and a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.