Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-06-15 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek MT6750 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the LG Q7, with a score of 98 against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than the LG Q7. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better display than LG Q7, because it has a bigger screen, a little bit better pixels quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a faster CPU than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Q7, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than LG Q7, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a way higher video resolution, a camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.