Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.05 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-05-26 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.87 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 505 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 11.65, which is a lot better than the LG X venture's overall score of 9.05. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but notably heavier than LG X venture. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 11 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite superior performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper screen than LG X venture, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, a really larger display and a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior camera than LG X venture, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a back facing camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than LG X venture, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The LG X venture features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has an 18 percent lower battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG X venture. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG X venture, giving up some specifications.