Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.23 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.28 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Bright cherry and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Moto E6 Plus, getting a score of 11.65 against 9.23. Despite being the best in this review, we must tell that it is also a a lot heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 11 version while Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a brighter display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a bit bigger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a much greater pixel number per inch of display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way better video resolution, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features greater battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.