Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.49 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-09-16 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Misty blue and Twilight orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Moto E7 Plus, with a general score of 11.65 against 9.49. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is just a bit heavier but just a little thinner than Moto E7 Plus, and they were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 11 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a way higher display pixels density, a bit larger display and a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better videos and photos than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot higher resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.