Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 8.95 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.56 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Misty blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 SM4250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola Moto G Play, with a 11.65 score against 8.95. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and a little heavier device than the Motorola Moto G Play, but Samsung managed to make it just a little thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better screen than Moto G Play, because it has a quite bigger screen, a way higher display pixels density and a much better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G Play, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution, a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Play, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G Play has greater battery duration than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Play. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto G Play, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.