Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.39 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-03-31 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 11.65, which is way better than Moto G5 Plus's score of 9.39. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is noticeably heavier than Moto G5 Plus, it's a little thinner and also newer. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a lot bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little greater pixels count per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality pictures and a lot higher video resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, resigning some features and specs.