Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.08 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 197.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 11.65, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G6's global score of 9.08. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer device than Motorola Moto G6, but it is extremely heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a just a little higher pixel amount in each screen inch, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G6, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better hardware performance than Moto G6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G6, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way larger sensor taking way better quality photos and videos, a way better video quality and a camera with way more MP. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery performance than Moto G6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto G6, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.