Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.46 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Moto G7, with a 11.65 score against 9.46. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer than Moto G7's, but it's way heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 11 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better performance than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto G7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G7. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Moto G7, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.