Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-04-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue and Turquoise |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, with a 11.65 score against 9.3. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite were only released 1 months apart, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is a little heavier but also just a bit thinner. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a brighter display than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a much greater pixels density and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.