Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-11-11 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P15 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 11.65, which is a lot better than Moto M's 9 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than Moto M, it is somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better performance than Moto M, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better display than Moto M, because it has a bigger screen, a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better screen density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater photos and videos than Moto M, because it has a camera in the back with much more MP, a bigger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Moto M, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features longer battery lifetime than Moto M, because it has a 64% greater battery capacity.