Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2015-09-03 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a lot better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is somewhat heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's a lot thinner and also a lot newer. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a quite superior hardware performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 9 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little lower pixel quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments, a lot better video quality, a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.