Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2015-09-01 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto X Style, getting a 98 score against 74.1. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto X Style, it's noticeably thinner and also much newer. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto X Style, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has 9 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Moto X Style, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a much better video definition, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.