Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.39 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 4.80 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 284.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Moto Z, with a 11.65 score against 9.39. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a notably newer device than Moto Z, but it is extremely heavier and extremely thicker. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z, because it has a larger number of cores and 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a little bit worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a larger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better storage to install applications and games than Moto Z, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much more MP camera and a much higher video definition.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z, letting go a couple specifications.