Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 4.80 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, having a 98 score against 75.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version and Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is newer than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's, although it's thicker and extremely heavier.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way better video quality and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.