Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 311.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 285 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Motorola One's 74.3 overall score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is newer than Motorola One's, but it is a lot heavier and thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a sharper display than Motorola One, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3200px resolution and much more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better processing unit than Motorola One, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photos and videos than Motorola One, because it has a lot better video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola One, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola One, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than Motorola One, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.