Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-10-12 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Space blue and Ultra violet |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P70 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Motorola One Macro, with a 11.65 score against 9.26. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than the Motorola One Macro, but it is heavier. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much better 1440 x 3200px resolution, a little bigger display and a way higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One Macro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a larger aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Motorola One Macro features a battery duration that is very similar to Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration, although the Motorola One Macro has just 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.