Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-05-27 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is newer and just a bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the nubia Red Magic 3.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the nubia Red Magic 3 both have extremely similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have a same size sensor and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with higher video frame rate and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a battery life that is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.