Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X2.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X2 features a processing unit that's very similar to the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one, they have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher video definition and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has greater battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 19% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.