Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Moonlight Black and Pearl White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and performance tweaks. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is somewhat heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Lite.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a little larger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features much more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.