Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Moss green and Rust red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a 98 score against 74.9. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little bit heavier device than realme X50 Pro 5G, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit worse display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better videos and photos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution camera and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.