Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 8.87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 4.97 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 509 pixels per inch | 296 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 11.65, which is a lot better than Galaxy A20e's overall score of 8.87. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 11 version and Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy A20e, but it is notably heavier and a little thicker.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better performance than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a brighter display than Galaxy A20e, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a lot more pixels per display inch and a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more MP camera. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.