Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-01-01 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s general score of 74.9. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is way newer than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, although it's a little heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bigger display, a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better number of pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a camera with a much better resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.