Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-03-30 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s score of 74.4. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is newer, but thicker and just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bigger display, a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s battery duration is just as good as Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.