Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gold and Rose gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having a general score of 98 against 75.3. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat thicker and a lot heavier phone than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way higher 108 megapixels resolution camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.