Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than vivo X70 Pro, with a score of 98 against 78.3. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version, providing the user some extra features. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo X70 Pro.
The vivo X70 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a greater pixel quantity per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bigger memory to store more apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures better videos and photos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a way tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a much lower image quality, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.